Sinn Féin can’t deliver United Ireland

Predictably, absolutely nothing new of real consequence emerged from Sinn Féin’s conference on a “United Ireland” last month. While attendees were invited to think new thoughts, there was precious little evidence of any. We should nevertheless welcome that at least Sinn Féin is now engaged with reality – no, they are not the “legitimate government”, yes Ireland is partitioned in reality, so indeed persuasion (and nothing else) must be the way forward.

For all that, it should be obvious that this is already an almighty task. For all the talk of finding ways to reflect “Unionists’ British identity” in a United Ireland, there is very little evidence that this identity is seriously understood and, in any case, the fact is that Unionists’ British identity is already reflected by the constitutional status quo.

Even if this could be overcome, one of the most obvious “new thoughts” should have been, of course, that Sinn Féin cannot deliver a United Ireland. You simply cannot, on one hand, apologise for a terrorist campaign designed to force Unionists into a United Ireland and then, on the other, act as persuaders of those same Unionists. The level of trust will never seriously be there to accomplish that.

In fact, the very first step in any progress towards Irish unity would be an acceptance that that terrorist campaign was both illegitimate and pointless. It is easy to forget that most Irish Nationalists do accept this basic point, even if they rarely say it as directly. So if a United Ireland is ever to become feasible, it will be those other Irish Nationalists, not Sinn Féin and certainly not Gerry Adams, to make it so.


2 thoughts on “Sinn Féin can’t deliver United Ireland

  1. Edward McCamley says:

    This is depressingly true. But it is half of a bigger truth.

    The maintenance of Northern Ireland’s position in the United Kingdom depends on at least the acquiescence of the Catholic population in the status quo. Unionists of whatever hue rarely show any understanding this; those who do, are denounced and purged. This nationalists’ (it’s not only SF) failure to acknowledge the validity of unionist identity is matched by a similar failure on the other ‘side’. This latter failure is more egregious-and more dangerous- since maintenance of the constitutional status quo is clearly of greater advantage to everyone. Needless disparagement of the Irish language, and the adoption of a perverse position on leaving the European Union, are the most recent examples of unionist folly in this regard.

  2. Martin says:

    I think SF expect that it will only be a few years before unionists lose their majority and therefore any referendum campaign need only be directed at the constituency that identifies with neither unionism nor nationalism, as well as getting out the nationalist vote in a turnout battle. In these circumstances persuading unionists isn’t really necessary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: