Why an ill-considered “Brexit” could de-stabilise NI

I happen to believe, all other things being equal, that Northern Ireland could do perfectly well out of the forthcoming UK/EU negotiations. On top of its ability to seek a bespoke deal of its own given its land border with an EU member state and shared citizenship entitlement, it is well used to instability already.

However, it could also do disastrously if “Brexit” is not properly thought through.

The essential problem is an unspoken one. The 1998 Agreement entitles people in Northern Ireland to be British, or Irish, or both; but also it is predicated on making it irrelevant which one anyone chooses. Since both British and Irish citizenship is currently EU citizenship (including an entitlement to use each other’s diplomatic corps abroad, for example), and both British and Irish citizens are effectively treated as “home” citizens in each other’s country (with some exceptions), it really is a free choice.

If the UK leaves the EU, and particularly if it leaves the European Economic Area (the Single Market) and/or the Customs Union, it will then matter which citizenship is chosen. There is a very real risk that the choice of British citizenship will put people at a disadvantage when seeking out opportunities in the EU, including in Ireland; conversely, there is a very real risk that the choice of Irish citizenship will put people at a disadvantage when seeking out opportunities in the rest of the UK. This whole thing will make it matter than Northern Ireland is constitutionally part of the UK in ways in which that status is currently irrelevant. At best, that will make people think again about whether the arrangement agreed to in 1998 (power-sharing in the UK with cross-border bodies) really works for them; at worst, it will lead to an outright schism of Northern Ireland’s population along British-Irish lines, undoing much if not all of what has been achieved over the past 20 years.

The crux of Northern Ireland’s conflict was (and is) identity, and EU membership was central to making it not matter. Doing anything which makes it matter at best risks a precarious balance. Frankly, this is a very good reason for the UK Government reconsidering the whole idea of leaving the EU. The fact is that most people who voted to leave the EU are not going to get out of “Brexit” what they really wanted to get out of it – regardless of what that is. Is it really a good idea, on the basis of a very narrow referendum result, to risk decades of careful work creating a balance which works in Northern Ireland, and thus keeps the whole UK as safe as it reasonably can be from Irish terrorism? It is, at the very least, worth considering whether the desires of those who voted to “leave” can be met in other ways.

If the UK Government decides, as it probably will do for a host of political reasons, that it really must proceed to leave the EU, then the next option is a “soft Brexit”. There would be no harm is emphasising that the constitutional balance of the UK, not least with regards to Northern Ireland, is best served by maintaining as far as possible commonality and mutuality of opportunity between the UK and the EU – and this means retention of the Single Market and the Customs Union. The difficulty here is that, frankly, such a “soft Brexit” would put the UK in a worse position than if it simply remained in the EU. It is unlikely to fly in practice.

The next option is a “Special Status” arrangement for Northern Ireland, and rationally that looks tempting. Northern Ireland alone could remain within the Customs Union; it could even in theory retain up to a point its own immigration policy (uniquely in the UK, it is already the case that employment policy is devolved to Northern Ireland). Alongside mutual recognition specific to Northern Ireland of Health care arrangements, driving licences and perhaps even things such as trading standards and environmental regulations, this would have the effect of maintaining almost all the social benefits of EU membership (albeit, from a Leavers’ point of view, maintaining also almost all the disadvantages). However, it would still be seriously destabilising, because it would mean that British citizens in Northern Ireland would be disadvantaged in certain ways – quite possibly, for example, by being asked for their passport and checked for goods every time they travelled to the rest of the UK. That the DUP would have shosen a course of action which brought this about would not be lost on many of us, but that would be little practical consolation. Did we not just spend decades overcoming that sort of thing?

As with so many aspects of “Brexit”, there is no evidence the UK Government has grasped the scale of the problem here. It will take more than a quick day trip for it to be fully understood, and some time for it to be effectively tackled. It we absolutely must leave the EU, it is vastly more important to do it carefully than to do it quickly.


2 thoughts on “Why an ill-considered “Brexit” could de-stabilise NI

  1. I definitely agree, beware the Fool English Brexit. English nationalism and Anti-EU/Anti-migrant sentiments have toxified the debate, and rather than encourage a sort of patriotic mood of some degree of democratic independence, has

    There is a danger for the stability of the Union, for an Irish nationalist I would say the danger is primarily England treating Northern Ireland’s post-Brexit problems with contempt, ignorance and apathy. It doesn’t destroy the union, it destabilizes it.

    That’s not going to make unionists Irish nationalist, or the English want to dump Northern Ireland onto the Republic, but it will cause tensions in both communities.

    The UUP have already pointed out that Northern Ireland’s only advantage in Brexit (i.e. one that it cannot develop either in the EU or by itself anyway) is that it becomes a “hedge your bets” state in Europe where a business is flexible to take an EU route through the Republic of Ireland or a UK route through its constitutional partners in Scotland, England and Wales.

    Eurosceptic (Brexitsceptic) Ulster Unionism has admitted Northern Ireland, has a selfish, strategic and economic interest in the Republic of Ireland’s European Union membership.

    Even if it over-zealously sold the belief that Dublin and Roslare could be HMRC ports for the UK nearly re-awaking the ghosts of the Anglo-Irish Economic War.

    Brexit was also won on pork barrel promises and faith in politicians who said their opponents were scaremongering, while doing the same themselves about the Turks, the Euro, and Southerners … but it’s pretty clear that the pork barrel is thin.

    In fact despite Ian Paisley’s insistence that EU money is merely UK money that would be better spent in UK hands, Northern Ireland was a net beneficiary of EU funding, so merely securing agricultural, science and community funding means Northern Ireland really gets nothing. Large chunks of the UK net contribution are going back to the European Union, to England and to Wales.

    Only savings are the combination of losing 3 MEPs and administration costs which would be the equivalent of cancelling The Nolan Show. The UK would still be paying for Martina Anderson’s pension.

    There are no repatriated powers going back to the assembly other than possibly agriculture with arguably a reduced budget and more bureaucracy.

    So as you said before, it comes back to what actually unites the ideals of Irish nationalism and the Unionists, self-determination and independence.

    Irish nationalism will have less “British money”, Northern Ireland Unionism will have more “British power” (over sensitive border issues and an agricultural sector twice as big per GDP as it is in GB) and may the best competing vision win.

    Of course most importantly when it comes to self-determination and independence … Eurosceptics need to stop blaming Brussels and Remain supporters and take responsibility themselves.

  2. Iyan Payslie says:

    Yapple was founded by Arabs and run by fags. So this is the famous “Irish Miracle”? Another drunkard grifter scam turning Ireland into tax haven to screw America? This is why Ulster must join Scotland and the Anglosphere must foil the Carolingian EU of Bonaparte, Heidler, Adenauer, Schumann, Degaulle, Galtieri! Yapple was founded by Arabs and run by fags. Fags is what you get when drunken Irish molest their kids. Arabs is where Irish banks make their money funding terrorists who used to work with the IRA.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: