Time for Cameron to step aside from EU debate

If you’re explaining, you’re losing.

One of the most astonishing moments of the Scottish independence referendum was when the three “unionist” party leaders shared a platform to explain “The Vow”. So badly had the “No” campaign been run, that it ended up doing the explaining – going into detail about what staying in the UK would mean. A less complacent and better run campaign would never have been in such a position; it would have forced the “Yes” side to do all the explaining (as Alasdair Darling had done successfully in the first debate), leaving all the uncertainty on the “Yes” side. As it was, it was left almost as unclear what a “No” vote would mean as a “Yes” vote – and a 30-point lead was reduced by two thirds come polling day.

Prime Minister David Cameron is now at risk of doing the same thing. He is spending far too much time discussing what his “reforms” are all about, at the expense of the much more fundamental debate about what is in the interests of households across the UK. The referendum question does not ask what we think of Mr Cameron’s reforms, nor (note well) what we think of Mr Cameron himself. It asks simply whether the UK should remain in or leave the European Union. That, and only that, is the issue.

Mr Cameron would be best, therefore, stepping aside now. His “reforms” are largely irrelevant. The issue is whether the UK wishes to remain part of the world’s largest free trade bloc (with the range of advantages that brings from a lower cost of living to an enhanced role on the global stage), or leave it and be sidelined (with all the uncertainties that brings from tariffs on food an electrical items to border controls and limited opportunities for R&D, science and agriculture).

As families for the first time in nearly a decade get used to wages rising in real terms but continue to be wary of global economic conditions, as we are faced with the greatest humanitarian horror on our frontier since at least the collapse of Yugoslavia, and as our free and democratic way of life is threatened by everything from Middle East terrorism to Far Eastern economic expansion, whether a few people have to wait a year or four years for in-work benefits is frankly neither here nor there.

Leaving the EU could see our holiday entitlements reduced; it could see the cost of living raised by up to £3000 per household; it could restrict our ability to seek trade, educational opportunities or even holidays in Continental Europe; it could destabilise the UK itself (with a second Scottish independence referendum and border controls re-introduced in Ireland); it could lead to American administrative, business and even military interests being transferred from the UK to a new “special relationship” with Germany, left as undoubted leader of Europe in the UK’s absence; it could see the withdrawal of CAP and PEACE funds from the UK’s periphery, enhancing the wealth gap between north and south (to the marked detriment of Northern Ireland); and it could see investment and jobs flow away from the UK, leaving our young people trapped with few opportunities (in a country which long ago lost its export base).

Proponents of “Leave” may want to deny some or all of the above. Let us hear them do so. Levels of child benefit for Romanians have nothing to do with anything – this debate is about the fundamental risk to our cost of living, job opportunities and social well-being that tearing us apart from the EU could cause. So let us have this debate, without delay.


3 thoughts on “Time for Cameron to step aside from EU debate

  1. William Allen says:

    I am some what confused as to where you get the idea that leaving the EU would cost £3000 per household. Given that the EU adds red tape and that the UK is a net contributor to the EU, I would imagine that it is more likely to lead to a reduction in the cost of living. I support the political concept of the EU but I believe it has always been bad for the UK economically.

    • The answer is simple.

      First of all, the “red tape” is a myth. HMRC employs more people than the entire EU. It is a myth promoted by the right as a means of complaining about businesses having to meet common standards in areas such as workers’ rights and consumer protection. Post-Brexit, either these would remain (with the consequent “red tape”) or they would be abolished (perhaps Nigel Farage likes the idea of American-style holiday entitlements and no protection for customers, but I don’t!)

      That is to leave aside that controlling our own borders entirely, managing our own trade negotiations, regulating our own product identification and so on would all require bureaucrats – doing things which are already done by 28 sets of taxpayers jointly.

      Leaving the EU would also see tariffs imposed on imports (the “Leave” side pretend this isn’t so, but once we have left we would have to do all the things they don’t like to regain access, rendering leaving pointless). That means French wine, German cars, Italian food, Swedish furniture, Dutch TV sets and a whole raft of other things would become more expensive. Toss in the consequences to investment of not being part of the world’s largest trading zone, and, well, the results are not pretty…

  2. Scots Anorak says:

    The fact that the UK is now on the brink of doing something as objectively hare-brained as leaving the EU suggests that the No side should have been doing rather more explaining itself during the Scottish independence campaign. The notion that the uncertainty was all on one side of the debate was a fantasy that the media unfortunately declined to challenge.

    The big worry for Northern Ireland is that Brexit will bring huge economic fallout coupled with a hard border. Irish citizens have the same political rights as British citizens in both Northern Ireland and Great Britain and can travel freely, but if Northern Ireland is not in the EU, there will have to be customs posts, with cars stopped and luggage searched. Since it is not economic to have such posts on each and every country road, many of the those that cross the border, including most of those re-opened after 1998, will have to be closed. Very likely Sinn Féin would present the UK Government with an ultimatum: hold a referendum on joint authority, or we walk.

    Regardless of what happened on that front, it is highly likely that paramilitary activity would increase. Brexit would be felt most keenly in majority-Catholic areas along the border, the same communities where Republican paramilitaries historically enjoyed some of their strongest support.

    If the UK leaves the EU, I don’t intend to be here for the result.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: