Peter Robinson – we’ll miss him when he’s gone

Peter Robinson is not my favourite Northern Irish politician. I find it hard even to admire a man who has completely U-turned on the position he held when he first entered politics, who is so devoid publicly of grace and kindness, and who has failed in seven years to deliver anything approaching the social and economic reforms we need to be a more open and prosperous society.

Yet we will miss him when he is gone.

With Paisley and now Robinson as Leader, the DUP was a party others could deal with. Dealing with it was tough, of course, and the outcome was often a let-down. But it was possible.

Internally too, the machine worked – it was Robinson, in fact, who delivered the DUP’s best ever election result in 2011. It was relatively clear who directed Unionism, even if we were often left baffled by its direction.

Even in the past month or so, the DUP has been coherent enough – just – to hold on in the Assembly when collapse must have been politically tempting (but would, for all its foibles, have been seriously damaging to all of us, economically and socially).

I am not convinced the post-Robinson DUP will be anything like as effective a machine. It will surely degenerate into factions; into incoherence between Westminster and Stormont; and into unmanageable instability between its religious and more secular wings.

This is good news for its electoral opponents, of course. However, it may in the long run make Northern Ireland’s slow political transition much harder to manage. There will be times – many times – when that is a very bad thing. Uncertainty and instability will become the absolute norm.

I do not believe, honestly, that Peter Robinson is a good man. However, he was capable at least of managing some good things. We may not believe it today, but a year from now someone somewhere will comment on how we miss him.


2 thoughts on “Peter Robinson – we’ll miss him when he’s gone

  1. Scots Anorak says:

    Not sure if I agree about Mr. Robinson being a good man — he seems more of an angry and venal one to me — but I do agree that there is a risk of his party falling prey to the Unionist disease of splitting to the right. This time around, that would be messy, and because of reforms instigated by the DUP itself there would be no guarantee of a seamless transition to another Unionist First Minister. Compared with the risks of Brexit, that may be a comparatively small destabilising factor, however.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: