Modern Sinn Féin on wrong side of history re McConvilles

Clearly, the big story over the past week has been the arrest and extended questioning of “a 65-year-old man” in connection with the abduction and murder of Jean McConville in 1972. I cannot deny I am staggered, having recently noted that the same man is effectively immune from prosecution. We shall see what the PPS does, but that is not the point here.

It is a gruesome story, even by the standards of the time. An Irish mother who had already been forcibly evicted from a majority Protestant part of the city was literally dragged away from the clutches of her 11-year-old child, and then buried on a beach 75 miles to the south, not to be uncovered for a generation. 10 children were left to grow up not just without their mother, but shunned by those around them (and thus unable to declare who took her away, even though they clearly know). That they have been able to lead any sort of life at all after that is extraordinary.

It is quite obvious that anyone with an interest in any sort of justice, including social justice, would be on the side of the victims here. It is also obvious that those who carried out such an appalling act, just before Christmas as it happens, were not peacemakers or visionaries but heartless thugs; and that they were not “defending their community” but attacking it. They were, of course, members of an organisation which killed more people, and indeed more Irish people and even specifically Irish Catholics, than any other during the Troubles.

Clearly also, no one with any remote interest in child welfare would be on the side of said 65-year-old man, given that he has already sheltered child abusers within his own family. Every nation has its, well, “dark side”. The dark side of the Irish nation is its determination to defend and promote a man who is so obviously a liar, so clearly protected child abusers, and so overtly associates with murderers who orphaned 10 Irish children – the same man was recently declared the most popular political leader in the Irish Republic (if so, frankly, the people of that Republic need to look at themselves).

It is also worth noting at this stage that “Irish Republicans” like to talk grandly of an inclusive Irish nation incorporating Protestant, Catholic and Dissenter; only recently Sinn Féin has talked of incorporating Unionists’ British identity in a “United Ireland”. Yet only a quick glance at a social media feed shows that anyone making the aforementioned obvious points (that in the battle between the shunned innocent orphans and the child abusing apologist for murderers anyone with any compassion would back the former) is instantly derided as a “Unionist”, or a “Brit spy” or a “Protestant lover”. Not content with knee-jerking to support a Leader who so obviously has not a shred of credibility to anyone objective, the so-called “Republican Movement” soon resorts to its fundamental sectarian base with dollops of whataboutery – and, most of all, attempts to limit people’s right to state their view based solely on “what” they are, as if some people’s views are less legitimate than others based solely on their national or religious background. This attempt at restricting free expression of opinion is, of course, as nothing compared to the intimidation of the McConvilles themselves.

Of course, there are smaller groups fully entitled to a but of whataboutery. This arrest came just days after the Ballymurphy families were incomprehensively denied their clear-cut case for a Hillsborough-style review; families of victims from the La Mon massacre to the Birmingham bombing also await some semblance even of the recognition of the lack of justice in their cases; there was a release concerning the McGurk’s Bar atrocity too last week.

Ultimately, this is all yet another example of how our past defines our present, even if we would wish it otherwise – and why we therefore need a managed process to deal with that past. Most of all it is, frankly, why in 2014 we should all deal with each other with a lot more civility than was the norm in the past.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Modern Sinn Féin on wrong side of history re McConvilles

  1. harryaswell says:

    Well said! An excellent post which covers the situation exactly. One does have to realise that the Republican Movement, acka Sinn Fein/IRA, entered these peace talks under duress and because they had virtually no option due to public opinion both North and South of the border. They have since behaved without any honour at all, and cannot be trusted or believed. Look at how quickly they threatened violence at the holding of their “Leader” for questioning. Hypocrisy, lies, deceit, threats and murder is all that they are good for. How can one possibly sue for a proper peaceful solution to our problems when dealing with people such as those? Every word, every promise cannot be relied upon. They entered the Peace Talks solely because they thought they could bluff our politicians with deliberate lies, and to try to bounce us into a United Ireland against the will of the people. There may well be a majority of RC’s here but I will bet any money that the majority of those would prefer the status quo. Democracy has been flaunted and continues to be so.

    • Charming Man says:

      “Democracy has been flaunted…” Like it was when this sectarian statelet was formed down the barrel of a gun?

      • Well then be honest: you want a sectarian state encompassing the whole island.

        Why not just admit it?

      • Hector Smith says:

        no, protestant, catholic and dissenter…..

      • harryaswell says:

        Yes, exactly so. The Republican Movement did all it could to defy the democratic wishes of the people, right from the Easter Rising up to today. “Ballot Paper in one hand, Armalite in the other”, remember that? It is also incorrect to define Northern Ireland as a “statelet”. It is a fully qualified State, recognised Internationally as such and also as part of the UK and accepted as such in a Democratic Referendum by ALL the Irish people. But then, you knew that already!

  2. Seymour Major says:

    “A managed process to deal with the past”
    That does not really tell us what you think the solution should actually be.
    The problem, as always, is balancing the need for truth with the need for justice. If you increase the chance of one, you limit the chance of the other. Many victims will go on hurting for justice. Unfortunately, their hurt is holding up Northern Ireland from moving on.
    I think the Boston project was a good idea. It would have been better if the organizers had taken sound legal advice before setting it up.
    I would suggest that something similar to the Boston project ought to be set up but with legislation passed so that the material is immune from disclosure until the death of the contributor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: