DUP no longer qualifies for Executive

The DUP likes to play up the fact it is responsible for the 2006 Agreement rather than the 1998 version. 2006 was, apparently, a fairer deal, not least because it had more to say about support for… wait for it… the Rule of Law and Policing.

Indeed, after the 2006 Agreement, a Ministerial Code was inserted for all Executive Ministers, whose Pledge of Office requires: “uphold[ing of] the rule of law based as it is on the fundamental principles of fairness, impartiality and democratic accountability, including support for policing“.

Last Summer, DUP Ministers (endorsed by their UUP allies) failed to do this, however. They chose instead to endorse paraders who had breached legally binding Parades Commission determinations, and thus failed the uphold the Rule of Law.

In fact the text of the Agreement goes further, including: “We believe that the essential elements of support for law and order include endorsing fully the Police Service of Northern Ireland and the criminal justice system, actively encouraging everyone in the community to co-operate fully with the PSNI in tackling crime in all areas and actively supporting all the policing and criminal justice institutions, including the Policing Board”.

Angrily confronting police lines on behalf of flags protesters causing disruption is “actively encouraging everyone in the community to co-operate fully with the PSNI“, is it? Directly accusing the PSNI of being “heavy-handed” without providing evidence through the channels of independent investigation available is “supporting all the policing institutions“, is it?

The Rule of Law is fundamental to democracy; and includes support for the Police’s role in upholding and even enforcing that law – whether or not you happen to agree with it. If you wish to change that law, you do so through the democratic institutions, including by election. It is basic stuff – and, in Northern Ireland, it is constitutional stuff. Ministers are prohibited, constitutionally, from opposing the Rule of Law, including from opposing policing.

Which begs an obvious question: why are DUP Ministers still in the Executive?

The practical answer is that, bizarrely, although decisions by Ministers may be subject to Judicial Review, blatant breaches of the Ministerial Code are not (instead, they are determined by the parties themselves). The idea was that Sinn Fein would inevitably be the party to breach them, and that the DUP would then bring the institutions down. With the DUP now actually in breach and thus both the largest parties out of the running (and the UUP safely tucked into the DUP’s bosom), that leaves the Alliance Party and the SDLP – and the latter seems to have fallen asleep.

The Alliance Party is marked out from the other four by two things: firstly and obviously, its cross-community credentials; secondly and equally importantly, its consistent and absolute support for the Rule of Law at all times since 1970. The party cannot and will not collude with a system which blocks or even hinders the Rule of Law, as that is fundamentally undemocratic. No democratic party will tolerate a system which leaves people making the law while also endorsing those who are breaking the law.

The timetable is already clear. The DUP has set in motion chaos in Mid-Ulster, by selection of a joint candidate in a way designed to turn the whole campaign into a bitter re-opening of past wounds; the DUP has set in motion chaos in Belfast, with yet another flags dispute deliberately set in train for early May; the DUP has set in motion chaos around parades, with no support for enforcement of parades determinations or the general public’s right to go about their business (for example, to get home from work or attend a football match). What democrat could then continue to tolerate their presence in government?


5 thoughts on “DUP no longer qualifies for Executive

  1. james McKerrow says:

    Ian, I would liken the Alliance Party to the conclave of mice called to consider the deprivations caused by marauding cats. The democratically arrrived at solution was to place bells on collars round the necks of all cats so that mice would be warned of the approaching danger. But not one mouse could be found willing to do the actual placing of the bells, so the conclave ended with a solution which couldn’t be enacted.

    Democracy is a system of goverment which generally avoids tyrany and bloodshed. It is messy and inneficient. The primacy of law and the protection of liberties developed in these islands over hundreds of years, predating the relatively recent emergence of liberal democracy and near universal sufrage. What is important is that the institutions within democracy are strong enough to overcome departures and reverse tendencies to either autocracy or anarchy, which so far they have. And I would rather have the DUP and Sinn Fein inside the tent …. .

    Alliance would be better advised to move away from “belling the cat” motions to more practical policies!

  2. It’s clear the DUP have no control over either the flag protesters or the loyal orders, the unity candidate thing seems to be a matter to appease certainly the latter, and I would seriously question how many grassroots supporters would back unity candidates in the long run.
    I forget who the unity candidate is, and other than having a vendetta against Francis Molloy I’m not sure what exactly he has to offer the people of mid-Ulster but the chance to put the manners on Sinn Féin. “No” Politics seems almost as abstentionist as the “No politics” that Sinn Féin provide at Westminster. Places West of the Bann are hurt by sectarian head counts more so than abstentionist candidates.

  3. Clare says:

    Totally agree Ian, but they are the largest party and without bringing the whole system crashing down what is to be done?
    An effective, organised opposition might help.

    • Well, “nothing” isn’t an option. The penalty for doing nothing is the destruction of the economy, destruction of community relations, and destruction of democracy. Let’s be very, very clear about that.

      A mere “Opposition” would be far too small and the creation of one (presumably by the Alliance Party) would leave the Executive without its only realistic option for a Justice Minister – thus bringing the whole thing crashing. So that’s not an option, at least not in the short term.

      I would propose the return of the Decommissioning Body which, if you recall, also had a role in monitoring party behaviour. An Independent Body like that would be given the power to advise the Secretary of State to suspend or even expel a Minister (with that place taken by the next qualifying party, not the same one).

  4. Clare says:

    A good proposal Ian. There seems to be very little accountability.
    Take for example the appalling scenes in Donegall Street last year.
    Ministers such as Nelson McCausland excused the behaviour and went almost
    as far as supporting it.
    Aside from the fact that he was encouraging breaking the law, the blatent sectarianism
    should not be the characteristic of a minister in government here.
    The collapse of the UUP will only make matters worse in regard to what the DUP think they can get away with.
    I’m really not sure when the electorate are going to waken up to who they have elected to Stormont and the appalling image they give of Northern Ireland.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: